North Forge:Hazard: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:58, 2024 October 15

We are required to document hazards. This documents how the information is stored on the wiki. I am not planning on a "Hazard" page in the actual documentation namespace, the hazards will be displayed on the tool/room/SDS pages where they are relevant.

Hazards might be identified during North Forge:Job Hazard Analysis, Safety Inspections, Safety Incident Reviews or ad-hoc.

Hazards feed into the North Forge:Risk Assessment Matrix/Risk Assessment Matrix.

for all	The stuff on this page is not built yet, but I plan to put it together this week, so talk to me ASAP if you don't want it this way. Ttenbergen (talk) 22:42, 2024 October 13 (CDT)

template:Hazard for this that can be included on North Forge:Tool pages, room or North Forge:SDS pages
One instance per hazard, so a tool could have zero, 1 or many
Each includes
- source (JHA, WHMIS)
- type (physical, chemical, biological, muscoloskeletal injury, psychosocial, health(to accommodate WHMIS))
- acute vs chronic
- always vs maintenance only
- description, one sentence for things like signs
- mitigation (separate for PPE?), one sentence, details would be SWP I think
- whether it affects at room level
- North Forge:Risk Assessment Matrix fields
  - probability
  - severity
  - frequency
  - # members affected

for all	Additional fields? Ttenbergen (talk) 22:42, 2024 October 13 (CDT) WHMIS details such as class would be stored on the SDS, but the hazard should be stored via template:hazard

the encoded data will then show as appropriate on all the relevant pages. For example, if an SDS for 3dp resin is a hazard to eyes, then a printer that connects to the SDS will list this hazard, and if it was tagged as room level, then the room will list it as well.

follow-ups

for all	Tina List of pages with hazards not edited in 3 years for North Forge:Workplace Safety and Health Program add to North Forge:Job Hazard Analysis a query here to show the tools and sdss that have hazards, how many, and when last edited.

Sign formatting

Default values

for all	we could set each tool to list the "Unknown Hazard" hazard that escalates ranking in North Forge:Risk Assessment Matrix. Edit the tool and instead apply the "No associated Hazard" or specific hazard and that gets hidden and de-escalate the RAM placement. Could help motivate updates. Or could disengage. open to thoughts. Ttenbergen (talk) 22:58, 2024 October 13 (CDT)

Form

suggest to use Hierarchy of Controls for mitigation portion
link to North Forge:Job Hazard Analysis that links to the instructions from Safework for what questions to ask etc

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 * One instance per hazard, so a tool could have zero, 1 or many
 * Each includes
-** type (physical, chemical, etc)
+** source (JHA, WHMIS)
+** type (physical, chemical, biological, muscoloskeletal injury, psychosocial, health(to accommodate [[WHMIS]]))
 ** acute vs chronic
+** always vs maintenance only
 ** description, one sentence for things like signs
 ** mitigation (separate for PPE?), one sentence, details would be SWP I think
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
 {{Discuss |
 * Additional fields? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] ([[User talk:Ttenbergen|talk]]) 22:42, 2024 October 13 (CDT)
+* WHMIS details such as class would be stored on the [[SDS]], but the hazard should be stored via [[template:hazard]]
 }}