Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Safety Incident Review: Difference between revisions

From North Forge
Inspired and partly taken from https://northforge.ca//wp-content/uploads/2023/01/North-Forge-Safety-Manual-Winnipeg_Oct.21-22.pdf "Safety incident and near miss reporting"
 
No edit summary
 
Line 18: Line 18:
* Improper motivation
* Improper motivation
* Lack of skill
* Lack of skill
* Inadequate orientation
* Inadequate [[Safety Orientation]]
* Inadequate training
* Inadequate training
* Inadequate tools
* Inadequate tools

Latest revision as of 12:52, 2024 September 10

If an incident has been reported through Safety Incident Reporting it will be reviewed by a member of the Safety Committee. This is a checklist for that review. Add additional checkpoints as we learn about them.

Indirect or direct cause

  • Operating equipment without training
  • Failure to use PPE
  • Failure to follow procedures
  • Housekeeping
  • Using equipment improperly
  • Using defective tools / equipment
  • Horseplay
  • Failure to secure
  • Other ??

Root cause

  • Design of workspace
  • Not enough electrical outlets
  • Physical stress
  • Improper motivation
  • Lack of skill
  • Inadequate Safety Orientation
  • Inadequate training
  • Inadequate tools
  • Other

Additional documentation

  • Photos
  • Training records
  • Video / CCTV
  • Diagrams / sketches

Corrective action

  • recommendation on what needs to be changed to fix
  • recommendation on preventing recurrence

Follow-through

  • when were the recommended actions completed
  • if the actions were rejected by the Fablab, were the alternatives satisfactory to the Safety Committee
  • if there is no resolution, does the issue need to be raised to Workplace Safety and Health