Page values for "Safety Terminology"

Safety Terminology

• Does this come from a standard? If so, which? Ttenbergen (talk) 21:10, 2024 October 16 (CDT)
  • No, just things that I thought were concise and effective at the time I wrote this for the SWP template document. I haven't been able to find any standard system beyond WHMIS -John
    • The pictographs in ISO7010 might be a starting point. Big list, though. Reading through what you have, does it need an eye hazard? Re the distinction with chemical ones, aren't those two more a result than a hazard? I mean, stuff gets on you (airway, skin, eye, digestive tract) and then has that effect. So wouldn't the route be the hazard (as you have with inhalation) and the chemical portion the "what does it do there" in addition to allergies or acute toxicity? Somehow I am sure a standard exists for this. I'll ask someone I met at a mediawiki conference who does risk analysis for NASA. If he doesn't know one I will concede there is no such thing :-) Ttenbergen (talk) 09:59, 2024 October 19 (CDT)
• I remembered a concept from one of the mediawiki conferences I went to: ontologies. What I am finding is not really the topic of this page, and not really part of North Forge's Fablab documentation, so I am putting it on North Forge:OHS Ontologies; in the end I have not yet found one that's all that helpful, though. Ttenbergen (talk) 10:05, 2024 October 20 (CDT)